Absolutely agree and that’s exactly why I wrote this. What I’m offering isn’t “one-size-fits-all,” but a starting framework based on metabolic function, not just population averages. We’ve normalized dysfunction, and now the bar for "health" is set by the chronically unwell. The goal isn't to obsess over numbers - it's to understand patterns, ratios, and how they match symptoms and biology. Thanks for commenting — this kind of conversation is exactly what we need.
That’s very helpful info
Thank you!
I keep saying this, 'a 1 size fits all is a falicy, & often f8gures get tweeked to make it look like your sick' from previous older statistics.
Absolutely agree and that’s exactly why I wrote this. What I’m offering isn’t “one-size-fits-all,” but a starting framework based on metabolic function, not just population averages. We’ve normalized dysfunction, and now the bar for "health" is set by the chronically unwell. The goal isn't to obsess over numbers - it's to understand patterns, ratios, and how they match symptoms and biology. Thanks for commenting — this kind of conversation is exactly what we need.